🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.